<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="">
<!--
p
{margin-top:0;
margin-bottom:0}
-->
</style>
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="x_divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p>Hi <span>Marcin,</span></p>
<p><span><br>
</span></p>
<p><span>Thanks for the clarification. I should have find read it myself perhaps.</span></p>
<p><span><br>
</span></p>
<p>Apologize for not being clear from the beginning, but I'm afraid that we might fall under the "distribution" restriction in what you quoted below. The thing is that our usage of the Kea DHCP is not to be a DHCP server per se inside organisation, but rather
be a part of our product/solution. it might mean that we are going to distribute it to our customers since dhcp server is a part of our system.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><span style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif,"Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji",NotoColorEmoji,"Segoe UI Symbol","Android Emoji",EmojiSymbols; font-size:16px">With all </span><span style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif,"Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji",NotoColorEmoji,"Segoe UI Symbol","Android Emoji",EmojiSymbols; font-size:16px">that
said, am I interpreting it correctly that our use case can violate MPL and we cannot do local modifications to the code? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif,"Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji",NotoColorEmoji,"Segoe UI Symbol","Android Emoji",EmojiSymbols; font-size:16px">Are build system files treated as source code in this scenario even if modifications
done only to get it built? What is actually considered as "source code" - any file in the tarball/repo? </span>I'm not really good in that legal questions.</p>
<p><span><br>
</span></p>
<p><span>Thanks,</span></p>
<p><span> Ilya. </span></p>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> Marcin Siodelski <marcin@isc.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, October 20, 2016 2:43:31 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Ilya Kruglik; kea-users@lists.isc.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Kea-users] License and</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hello Ilya,<br>
<br>
No. It doesn't violate the license. Please see the following:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/">https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/</a><br>
<br>
Specifically:<br>
<br>
"The MPL only creates obligations for you if you want to distribute the<br>
software outside your organization."<br>
<br>
Marcin Siodelski<br>
ISC<br>
<br>
On 20.10.2016 09:35, Ilya Kruglik wrote:<br>
> Hello,<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> There's a known issue with cross build which even a ticket exists for, e.g.:<br>
> <br>
> <a href="http://kea.isc.org/ticket/3745">http://kea.isc.org/ticket/3745</a><br>
> <br>
> <br>
> I have a question in this regard: Would it be a license violation if we<br>
> patch automake files (Makefile.am) locally to make it compiled in our<br>
> environment (Poky)?<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Best regards,<br>
> <br>
> Ilya.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Kea-users mailing list<br>
> Kea-users@lists.isc.org<br>
> <a href="https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users">https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users</a><br>
> <br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>