OpenReg still active?

Muhammad Aslam euphuric at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 2 03:47:53 UTC 2005


Dear All, 

As far as the CoCCA Registry is concerned, .af ccTLD
is currently using CoCCA registry along with other
ccTLDs and we are happy with it. 

However, I am going to present a demo of the CoCCA
OpenReg in APRICOT 2005 in Kyoto Japan, if anyone is
interested you are most welcome to come and see the
demo. Additionally if any ccTLD is willing to use
CoCCA we (CoCCA) will be glad to help them with it.

Regards,


-Aslam

--- Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.NA> wrote:

> Stephane,
> 
> Before you accuse anyone, you should perhaps talk to
> them first.
> 
> Maybe the name "CoCCA OpenReg" is deceptively close
> to the dormant "ISC
> OpenReg", but it has nothing to do with it, since
> for example the latter
> is written in perl, the former in Java, and the
> former models on the
> auDA Registry rather than on the one developed for
> the .ORG bid.
> 
> And the main difference is that it is not vaporware,
> but actually runs
> Registries/Registrars.  And no offence meant towards
> ISC, I am sure they
> spent a lot of resources.
> 
> As far as Open Source goes, I will spend much more
> time installing (and
> perhaps even modifying) the source code than wasting
> my time about fine
> print. And, once it is working, we'll make the
> source available for
> download on our site.
> 
> In short I question your knowledge about this.
> 
> BTW, how far is your project?
> 
> el
> 
> 
> In message <20050130211414.GA18100 at sources.org>,
> Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 02:11:28PM -0500,
> >  Michael H. Lambert <lambert at psc.edu> wrote 
> >  a message of 12 lines which said:
> > 
> > > I found the site at www.cocca.cx, but I couldn't
> find a pointer to
> > > the software.
> > 
> > http://www.cocca.cx/tools.jsp
> > 
> > AFAIK, ".cx" software is NOT free software (free
> as in free speech,
> > not free as in free beer). They claim it to be
> "open source", yet
> > there is no evidence that they comply with
> requirements such as the
> > "Open Source Definition"
> > (http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php).
> > 
> > They also keep mentioning OpenReg ("CoCCA OpenReg
> is based on core
> > specifications recommended for the .au Registry")
> while the software
> > has nothing to do with OpenReg.
> > 
> > In short, I question their honesty.
> > 
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


More information about the openreg-users mailing list