installing openreg on a remote server

Marko Anastasov marko.anastasov at gmail.com
Sun Apr 22 22:29:29 UTC 2007


Can someone tell me what these refer to in db/Makefile:
DBNAME=srs
DBUSER=srs

^ This assumes that there is a registered postgresql user srs?

DBROOT=pgsql

^ Is this supposed to be the installation path?

Thanks,
Marko


On 4/23/07, Serhiy Korycki <korycki at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Openreg is absolutely applicable to usage after certain rework.
> On 4/23/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic.fr > wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:35:04PM -0600,
> > Luis Diego Espinoza S. <lespinoz at gmail.com> wrote
> > a message of 68 lines which said:
> >
> > > This can tell you something about this software.  I have many
> > > problems trying to put on working and another people from other
> > > NIC?s tell that is broken.
> >
> > Please do not refer to anonymous reviewers. If people have issues with
> > OpenReg, they can certainly post here (or directly to ISC). Otherwise,
> > saying that "another people tell ..." is useless because I could say,
> > for instance "many people from the largest NICs told me that OpenReg
> > is great".
> >
> > Now, to the software itself. I do not think you can design a registry
> > software which is "double-clickable": a registry is a complex and
> > delicate thing, it is not a word-processor. A registry software is
> > closer to a library than to a "double-clickable" program: it is
> > intended for people who will work on it, not just with it. Some
> > aspects of the registry business (for instance the varieties of
> > registration policies) make it that way.
> >
> > If you know a registry software which is better than OpenReg, speak up
> > and say the name, an informed comparison could certainly be useful for
> > everyone.
> >
> > In my experience, OpenReg is certainly not easy to install but all the
> > competitors I tried are not better in that respect (they may have
> > other strengths).
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>




More information about the openreg-users mailing list