BIND 4.9.7 for NT and XFRNETS

[Khachaturov, Vassilii]

No you will not.
192.168.0.0 by itself is equivalent to 192.168.0.0&255.255.255.0, not to
192.168.0.0&255.255.0.0 as 192 to 223 (including) in the highest octet means
a class C network.

Why do you want to shorten the XFRNETS param?

-----Original Message-----
From: Stanley Liu [mailto:stanley.liu at tmca.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 7:45 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.uu.net
Subject: BIND 4.9.7 for NT and XFRNETS


In an intranet environment (internal DNS), I have the following XFRNETS
in named.boot:

     XFRNETS 150.45.0.0&255.255.0.0 192.168.0.0&255.255.0.0

I need to allow more zone transfers.  I want to shorten the XFRNETS
parameter.

Will I get the same result by removing the mask like

     XFRNETS 150.45.0.0 192.168.0.0