Confused about named.local semantics
barmar at bbnplanet.com
Mon Nov 29 19:37:06 UTC 1999
In article <s44lljnmvm91 at corp.supernews.com>,
Terry Lee, Publisher <magic at area-net.com> wrote:
>I realize that my network seems to be working perfectly and that I shouldn't
>fix it, but it is driving me crazy which SOA and NS entries are correct for
>named.local on primary and secondary name servers for the zone area-net.com
>which uses ns1.area-net.com (220.127.116.11) & ns2.area-net.com (18.104.22.168)
>for name servers:
>IN SOA localhost.
>IN NS localhost.
The NS and SOA records for the 127.0.0 reverse domain don't really matter,
since no remote servers will ever query them.
Barry Margolin, barmar at bbnplanet.com
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
More information about the bind-users