And I was wondering why my nameserver went haywire
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
jruigrok at via-net-works.nl
Tue Apr 25 11:41:52 UTC 2000
-On [20000424 20:10], Barry Margolin (barmar at genuity.net) wrote:
>In article <20000421223419.D35334 at lucifer.bart.nl>,
>Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok at via-net-works.nl> wrote:
>>dig @ns1.cwie.net any 61.230.240.207.in-addr.arpa
>
>dig just says "ns_initparse: Message too long" when I try it.
Which dig would that be? This is the 8.2.2-p5 one and I get a 2000 PTR
records back =\
>>Already mailed the admins.
>>
>>How do you guys deal with stuff like this? I mean, I mailed the admins,
>>told them they are lame for doing something as stupid as mapping X hosts
>>to one PTR record. But what if they don't change their act?
>
>Then I guess you'll have to go elsewhere for your porn.
ROFL! =)
>You could make your local nameserver authoritative for the
>61.230.240.207.in-addr.arpa zone, and put a single PTR record pointing to
>hadar.cwie.net in it.
Yeah, but it would be better if these guys fix their DNS. =)
>>For the time being I blackholed ns1.cwie.net because my logfile was
>>filling up like mad.
>
>I wonder why you're doing so many lookups of this address. Our nameservers
>have only logged 24 "TCP truncated" messages for that entry in the past 3
>days.
No idea. Obviously lots of our clients like to watch pr0n or something.
*hides his $HOME/pr0n* ;)
I am not concerned with the implications of the TCP truncated part, but
moreso with those messages filling up our logs.
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator
<jruigrok at via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl
We never know the worth of water, 'till the well is dry...
More information about the bind-users
mailing list