BIND 9.1.2 and TinyDNS???

D. J. Bernstein 75628121832146-bind at sublist.cr.yp.to
Mon Jul 2 17:27:24 UTC 2001


Brad Knowles writes:
> What you're not seeing, and which is being totally hidden by the
> server, is the fact that the nameserver is critically short on memory,

With djbdns, the default dnscache logs include statistics on cache
effectiveness. It's easy to measure how heavily loaded your cache is.
See http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/faq/cachex.html#cachemotion.

> having your nameserver thrash around swapping and paging like mad is 
> actually good,

That's absurd. Users are much happier with dnscache, which stays within
the memory limit and continues providing reasonable performance even
under very heavy loads.

  [ AOL outage a few years ago ]
> Voila, you've taken down e-mail for the entire Internet.

You didn't manage to take down email at sites running qmail. We
continued delivering to non-AOL sites without trouble.

---Dan


More information about the bind-users mailing list