Windows 2000 DNS

Iain Johnstone iain.johnstone at forwardcontrol.com
Tue Jun 12 20:51:40 UTC 2001


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We run a VERY large global WIN2K domain and use BIND for DNS. All
WIN2K entries are entered statically in the zone file. Any time there
is a change (e.g. FSMO role) we change the records by hand.

The main problem we have is with secure dynamic updates. Until this is
fixed, which I believe will be soon, we will continue with the manual
static method.

Cheers
Iain

- -----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]On
Behalf Of BRANCH DONALD
Sent: 12 June 2001 21:17
To: Bind (E-mail)
Subject: Windows 2000 DNS




Just looking for some pro's and cons on windows2000 DNS vs. Bind.

Any comments appreciated

Donald


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Business Security 5.5.3

iQA/AwUBOyaA3J6FEoJ+/gL7EQIKHACg9p+9N42z9kVx5l/yNbjX/gocEr4AoPEZ
d8fRhYuzcvT97VZu4DBUm4wO
=39st
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the bind-users mailing list