lamers question

Brad Knowles brad.knowles at skynet.be
Sat Mar 31 11:55:08 UTC 2001


At 1:29 PM +0200 3/31/01, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:

>  I "enhanced" the lamers script to work with 9.1.1's log messages.

	Cool.  If you can send me diffs, I'll be glad to include them in 
my official version.

>  They mostly are. Hey, I didn't know that the dig output format changed...
>  Let's merge what we both already did!

	Actually, one of the things I'd like to do is to set up a central 
lamers server, and have a "sort | uniq" version of the entries be 
sent periodically to this central site, where these kinds of queries 
are run just once.  Then you summarize that and post the results 
(along with the name and IP address of the machine to first notice 
that a particular server was lame for a particular zone), to 
comp.protocols.tcpip.domains on a weekly basis.

	Anybody interested?

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be>

/*        efdtt.c  Author:  Charles M. Hannum <root at ihack.net>          */
/*       Represented as 1045 digit prime number by Phil Carmody         */
/*     Prime as DNS cname chain by Roy Arends and Walter Belgers        */
/*                                                                      */
/*     Usage is:  cat title-key scrambled.vob | efdtt >clear.vob        */
/*   where title-key = "153 2 8 105 225" or other similar 5-byte key    */

dig decss.friet.org|perl -ne'if(/^x/){s/[x.]//g;print pack(H124,$_)}'


More information about the bind-users mailing list