Fw: DNS & NAT

Adam Lang aalang at rutgersinsurance.com
Wed May 16 20:25:16 UTC 2001


Yup.  Actually, that is probably where you should put your public name
server.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lars Wittebrood" <info at lawnet.xs4all.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind
To: <comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: DNS & NAT


> Hi,
>
> what I want to know is :
>
> if you have only ONE public ip adres, can you set up a BIND name server in
a
> DMZ BEHIND a firewall (with NAT) which will host a true domain name?
>
> Like :
>
> INTERNET
>        |
>        |
> FIREWALL---------DMZ
>        |
>        |
>    LAN
>
> MTIA,
>
> Lars Wittebrood.
>
> "mono" <monoton at tiscalinet.ch> wrote in message
> news:9dosjk$pf4 at pub3.rc.vix.com...
> >
> > hi group
> >
> > is there a way to setup a dns server, so that it has private (192.168.0)
> > and public addresses in a zone, while only propagating the public
> > addresses to the world?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > nico
> >
> >
>
>



More information about the bind-users mailing list