Dynamic DNS question and update forwarding

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Fri May 18 23:45:45 UTC 2001


The source address of the forwarded update will be whatever interface the packet
was sent from on 10.0.0.3. Note that this might *not* be 10.0.0.3 if the box is
multihomed (in fact you might even be able to play some ugly tricks using virtual
interfaces if you really had to).

Why bother with update forwarding at all? Why not have the domain controller update
the master directly?


- Kevin

lawrence.a.kravets at us.andersen.com wrote:

> Okay quick question.
>
> Here is my environment:
>
> Two DNS servers Bind 9.1.2 and 1 Windows 2000 Domain Controller.
>
> 10.0.0.2 DNS Server 1 Master for      ad.zone.com  <- this zone is enabled for
> dynamic dns and only allows ip addresses 10.0.0.2 and 10.0.0.3 to update
>
> 10.0.0.3 DNS Server 2 Slave for        ad.zone.com  <-update forwarding turned
> on to pointing to its master.
>
> 10.0.0.4 Windows 2000 Domain Controller  <-its dns server that it points to
> 10.0.0.3
>
> Okay here is my question.  The domain controller tries to do DDNS with DNS
> server 10.0.0.3. DNS server 10.0.0.3 is not master for the ad.zone.com domain,
> but it knows to forward DDNS requests to DNS Server 10.0.0.2.  What is the
> source address that 10.0.0.2 receives?  Does 10.0.0.3 get the request and then
> it try's to register 10.0.0.4 for it?  How does this scenario work?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Larry
>
> *******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
> are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of
> the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone.
> In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
> reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent
> to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
> information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
> firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.





More information about the bind-users mailing list