Slave Servers

[Kevin Darcy]

I can just see it now: "I don't have a clue what 'xfernets' means -- go ask
the MCSE".


- Kevin

Kevin Darcy wrote:

> Wouldn't it be ironic if MS-DNS were shortly the *only* popular nameserver
> implementation that still grokked a named.boot file? :-)
>
> - Kevin
>
> Terrence Koeman wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, MS-DNS can also use a BIND 4 style boot file. I think that
> > would make the adding a lot easier.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Terrence Koeman
> >
> > Technical Director/Administrator
> > MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.nl)
> >
> > Please quote all replies in correspondence.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]On
> > > Behalf Of Barry Margolin
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:54 PM
> > > To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> > > Subject: Re: Slave Servers
> > >
> > >
> > > In article <9oarsu$fjp at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
> > > Kris McElroy <kmcelroy at duracom.net> wrote:
> > > >I am running Bind 9.1 on Linux Redhat 7.1.  I setup a Windows 2000 DNS
> > as
> > > >slave for the Bind.  All works fine.  Question:
> > > >
> > > >    1.  If I add a zone to Bind 9.1 how do I or can it be done,
> > automate
> > > >the process of adding the zone to Windows 2000?
> > >
> > > There's nothing built into the DNS protocol to accomplish this.
> > >
> > > You would probably have to write some kind of script to run on
> > > Windows 2000
> > > that transfers the named.conf file and then updates the registry
> > > to add the
> > > zone to the W2K DNS configuration.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
> > > Genuity, Woburn, MA
> > > *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to
> > > newsgroups.
> > > Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted
> > > to the group.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar --
> > -- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
> > -- File: smime.p7s