Slave Servers

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Wed Sep 19 22:11:02 UTC 2001


Wouldn't it be ironic if MS-DNS were shortly the *only* popular nameserver
implementation that still grokked a named.boot file? :-)


- Kevin

Terrence Koeman wrote:

> Alternatively, MS-DNS can also use a BIND 4 style boot file. I think that
> would make the adding a lot easier.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Terrence Koeman
>
> Technical Director/Administrator
> MediaMonks B.V. (www.mediamonks.nl)
>
> Please quote all replies in correspondence.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org]On
> > Behalf Of Barry Margolin
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:54 PM
> > To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at moderators.isc.org
> > Subject: Re: Slave Servers
> >
> >
> > In article <9oarsu$fjp at pub3.rc.vix.com>,
> > Kris McElroy <kmcelroy at duracom.net> wrote:
> > >I am running Bind 9.1 on Linux Redhat 7.1.  I setup a Windows 2000 DNS
> as
> > >slave for the Bind.  All works fine.  Question:
> > >
> > >    1.  If I add a zone to Bind 9.1 how do I or can it be done,
> automate
> > >the process of adding the zone to Windows 2000?
> >
> > There's nothing built into the DNS protocol to accomplish this.
> >
> > You would probably have to write some kind of script to run on
> > Windows 2000
> > that transfers the named.conf file and then updates the registry
> > to add the
> > zone to the W2K DNS configuration.
> >
> > --
> > Barry Margolin, barmar at genuity.net
> > Genuity, Woburn, MA
> > *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to
> > newsgroups.
> > Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted
> > to the group.
> >
> >
>
> -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Listar --
> -- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
> -- File: smime.p7s





More information about the bind-users mailing list