Moving name server in house??

[phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu]

Wipe_out <wipe_out at go.com> wrote:
> Hi,

> I am thinking about moving my name server in house and getting a provider to
> act as secondary.. the main reason behind it is for manageability and
> control..

> Is there any reason why this is a bad idea?? (i.e. security issues or
> similar)

If you mean that you want to run DNS yourself, well that may be 
a mixed blessing.

If you do a good job, you will have all the benefits. 

And yes, asking a provider to act slave is a good thing. There is 
other too, like secondary.com that does this for a living.

And, when prepared, it's not that difficult. Have "the book" at hand,
seek a few friends that you can ask now & then, ventilate
your thoughts here.





-- 
Peter Håkanson         
        IPSec  Sverige      ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
           Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
	   remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.