Moving name server in house??

[James Bogart]

One thing to be aware of, some providers such as Allegiance do=20
not support secondary service, only primary service. The other
thing you should be aware of is that if you have less than a
"class C" address range, the reverse lookups get a little complicated.

See RFC 2317

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2317.txt=20

Other than above, a good idea.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wipe_out [mailto:wipe_out at go.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 6:06 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org
Subject: Moving name server in house??


Hi,

I am thinking about moving my name server in house and getting a =
provider to
act as secondary.. the main reason behind it is for manageability and
control..

Is there any reason why this is a bad idea?? (i.e. security issues or
similar)