One slave notified... other ignored?!?
amadei at dandy.net
Sat Oct 12 03:39:18 UTC 2002
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > What am I missing here? I suppose I can fix this with a also-notify
> > in the config, but I want to understand why. Is it possibly a bug that
> > BIND assumes it is ns.dandy.net and doesn't sent the notify?
> No, read RFC 1996. ns.dandy.net is in the MNAME field of amadei.com's SOA
> record, so it gets *removed* from the NOTIFY list because named thinks that's
> the name of the master.
Ahh.... I completely forgot about the MNAME in SOA. Crud... now I have a
zillion zones to edit. Thank god for sed.
Atlantic City, NJ
More information about the bind-users