One slave notified... other ignored?!?

Stephen Amadei amadei at
Sat Oct 12 03:39:18 UTC 2002

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Kevin Darcy wrote:

> > What am I missing here?  I suppose I can fix this with a also-notify
> > in the config, but I want to understand why.  Is it possibly a bug that
> > BIND assumes it is and doesn't sent the notify?
> No, read RFC 1996. is in the MNAME field of's SOA
> record, so it gets *removed* from the NOTIFY list because named thinks that's
> the name of the master.

Ahh.... I completely forgot about the MNAME in SOA.  Crud... now I have a
zillion zones to edit.  Thank god for sed.

Stephen Amadei
Dandy.NET!  CTO
Atlantic City, NJ

More information about the bind-users mailing list