Classless in-addr.arpa delegation
cricket at menandmice.com
Wed Oct 30 16:56:50 UTC 2002
Nate Campi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:26:34PM +0000, David Wilks wrote:
>> What is wrong with this approach for classless
>> in-addr.arpa delegation for smaller than class
>> C sub-nets? This is so much simpler than
> Nothing is wrong with this, and in fact many people do just this:
> [nate at slim:nate]$ nslookup 184.108.40.206
> Server: 127.0.0.1
> Address: 127.0.0.1#53
> Non-authoritative answer:
> 220.127.116.11.in-addr.arpa canonical name =
> 18.104.22.168.nxdomain.com. 22.214.171.124.nxdomain.com name =
> This is still a classless delegation, just not an example used in
> RFC2317. I personally think it's more visually appealing then the CIDR
> or range subdomains, but not as informative.
This is actually mentioned in section 5.2 of the RFC.
Men & Mice
DNS Software, Training and Consulting
The DNS and BIND Cookbook, available now!
More information about the bind-users