CNAME caching
Jim McAtee
jmcatee at mediaodyssey.com
Thu Oct 2 20:24:36 UTC 2003
So, what you're saying is that the resolving server would cache both records
and then follow the chain through its own cache? I din't realize that was how
records were cached. Just figured it would cache a single record with host
name and the resolved IP address.
Thanks.
Roger Ward wrote:
> Both.
>
> -Roger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org] On Behalf
> Of Jim McAtee
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 2:38 PM
> To: bind-users at isc.org
> Subject: CNAME caching
>
>
> When you have a CNAME pointing at an A record, what is usually used by a
> resolving server for the TTL - that of the CNAME or that of the record to
> which it resolves?
More information about the bind-users
mailing list