DHCP question

[KSP]

Hari,

You'd probably get a better result by subscribing and/or posting to one of
these lists:

http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/dhcp-lists.php

Good Luck,

ksp

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, T. Hariharan wrote:

> Hello,
>
> There doesn't seem to be a news group for DHCP, so posting this here.
>
> RFC2132 does not say if the length octect in variable length DHCP
> options should be treated as a signed or unsigned number. I think it
> should be unsigned (otherwise the length would have to be <128 bytes,
> which would be an unnecessary restriction), but would like to confirm
> that. I've seen an implementation that treats it as a signed number.
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
>