dns issue

Stephen Williams williamss at adelphia.net
Tue Aug 24 20:41:15 UTC 2004


Looks good on my end be sure to dump your cache to ensure good data.


[steven at charon.noc steven] 51% dig mail.goquest.com

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> mail.goquest.com
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 2
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; QUERY SECTION:
;;      mail.goquest.com, type = A, class = IN

;; ANSWER SECTION:
mail.goquest.com.       15M IN A        64.217.178.7

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
goquest.com.            15M IN NS       ns1.goquest.com.
goquest.com.            15M IN NS       ns2.goquest.com.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.goquest.com.        15M IN A        64.219.97.170
ns2.goquest.com.        15M IN A        64.219.97.171

;; Total query time: 108 msec
;; FROM: charon.noc to SERVER: default -- 24.48.64.3
;; WHEN: Tue Aug 24 16:40:17 2004
;; MSG SIZE  sent: 34  rcvd: 118

jester wrote:
> Can anyone take a look at A record for mail.goquest.com or 
> www.goquest.com.. When i do a DNS test, the root servers are returning an 
> incorrect (OLD) answer instead of referring to my dns server..
> (this is 2wks into this so all should be updated by now)
> 
> The correct answer should be 64.217.178.7
> nslookup outside our service is resolving to 12.18.108.8
> 
> Zone file:
> $TTL 15M
> @        IN SOA ns1.goquest.com. admin.goquest.com. (
>          2004082401
>          15M
>          15M
>          15M
>          15M
>          )
>                      IN      NS      ns1.goquest.com.
>                      IN      NS      ns2.goquest.com.
>                      IN      MX       10 mail.goquest.com.
> 
>                      IN      A       64.217.178.150
> www                 IN      A       64.217.178.150
> mail                IN      A       64.217.178.7
> 
> 
> 
> 
> When i do a DNS test form dnsstuff.com, it doesn't delegate the query to me 
> but forcing the root servers to answer with 12.18.108.8
> 
> Any help Appreciated,
> Thanks
> Michael 
> 
> 



More information about the bind-users mailing list