PTR Configuration Question
pde at rfc822.net
Fri Dec 10 21:28:01 UTC 2004
On Fri Dec 10, 2004 at 04:41:33 +0000, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
>MP> the only way they can delegate control over the PTR records for a
>MP> subnet of size less than /24 is to do something like what they set
>MP> out in RFC2317.
>False. That's not the only way.
Fine. "The only way they can delegate control over sub-24 allocations of
in-addr.arpa without actively engaging in cache poisoning is to follow
The aggressively antisocial and just plain broken aspects of your
worthless scheme have been debunked here and on the djbdns list for
years. Please, do everyone a favor and stop telling people to
deliberately leak namespace.
More information about the bind-users