DNS Round Robin
kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Fri Jan 30 00:25:45 UTC 2004
Bell, William IT wrote:
>Does BIND v9.2.3 allow multiple CNAME records, used to implement DNS round
>robin? For example:
>beta1.company.com. 30 IN A 192.168.1.1
>beta2.company.com. 30 IN A 192.168.1.2
>beta3.company.com. 30 IN A 192.168.1.3
>beta.company.com. 30 IN CNAME beta1.company.com.
>beta.company.com. 30 IN CNAME beta2.company.com.
>beta.company.com. 30 IN CNAME beta3.company.com.
>(You can also see a similar example in the middle of page 274 of the DNS &
>BIND, 4th Ed. book.)
>If not, does v9.2.3 support the 'multiple-cnames' statement?
>The DNS & BIND book states that neither of these features will work after
>BIND 9.1.0, but I was wondering if things might have changed since the book
No, it doesn't work, and it never *should*have* worked. CNAMEs are
exclusive, one-to-one mappings. Period. End of sentence. Use A-record
round-robin's or get yourself a real load-balancing device.
More information about the bind-users