Running BIND on MacOS X ?
bind9 at comcast.net
Fri Nov 5 23:40:01 UTC 2004
On Nov 5, 2004, at 3:46 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
> I am thinking to replace my old HP-UX secondary name server
> by a brand new Apple G5 biproc machine running MacOS X.
> I would be glad to receive some feedback from sysadmins
> running BIND on such beast.
There has recently been some discussion on this list, and the Apple
MacOS X Server list too, about DNS issues with MacOS X. There appears
to be any issue with one of the recent security updates, or maybe MacOS
X 10.3.5 in general. This has something to do with IPv6 queries.
Until there is a resolution to this, I would be hesitant to move a DNS
server to MacOS X. As was said by other responders, don't expect the
Apple supplied GUI to be able to help you much. Stick to editing the
configuration files manually.
DNS services don't require much CPU power. Stick to a single CPU
system, a dual processor box won't make things better. If you think
you need a dual CPU system because you are also running a web or mail
server on it - think again. Have a dedicated system to just run your
DNS services. Don't try and piggy back other services on a DNS server.
You don't want to loose your DNS service because your mail system, or
web server, hung your machine. You might want to consider a cheap
Intel box running FreeBSD as an alternative to a MacOS X system. The
differences is cost should be significant.
After saying this, don't get me wrong - I like and use Macs. They are
great systems, the Mac windowing system is excellent, and as someone
said before "MacOS X is what Unix should be like". The MacOS X Server
product is a workhorse providing file sharing, web services, MySQL,
etc. But, DNS servers don't need these capabilities and there are more
cost effective solutions. And, there currently are issues about MacOS
X and DNS. So, consider a different platform, or at least wait until
these DNS issues are resolved.
More information about the bind-users