Tuning Bind9?
Dave Lugo
dlugo at etherboy.com
Fri Jan 28 17:41:40 UTC 2005
fredrik.pettai at vattenfall.com wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We have bind 9(.2.x) on Solaris, since it's multithreaded and support =
> incremental updates.
>
> However, then we do _big_ zone-transfers of a hole zone (for example =
> RBL-zones), the name-resulotion (queries) becomes really slow, and those =
> zone-transfers can take a long time if you need to transfer the hole =
> zone.
> As i can see, there is only 4 threads working on the server but only =
> about 20% of cpu-usage totally during the heavy zone-tranfers (and no =
> other bottlenecks in the systemem that i can see...)
> Is it possible to trim bind so it have a chance to answer the queries =
> faster then a _big_ zone-transfer is in progress? I searched for ways of =
> increasing the the threads, but i found nothing. I've checked the =
> disk/mem/network connection of the machine and those things seems to be =
> quite enought. So i don't think it's a limit of the machine that makes =
> this "slowniness" during the _big_ zone-transfers...
> I didn't find any useful parameters to add i the configuration-file =
> either.
> Has someone else had this problem? and solved it?
>
> Regards,
I had similar problems. I solved them using rbldnsd as the backend for
DNSBL zones, with named in front of it.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo at etherboy.com LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list