Name Server Question

Barry Margolin barmar at alum.mit.edu
Sat Dec 30 02:44:19 UTC 2006


In article <en3jqh$1vp9$1 at sf1.isc.org>, seekuel <seekuel at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Hello group,
> I am new to BIND and I've configured a centos 4.4 box with bind,
> bind-chroot, caching-nameserver installed. This box functions an
> authoritative name server for our domain.
> 
> I am confuse. This server is an authoritative server for our domain and when
> our work station uses its public ip as the dns that workstation cannot
> resolve other domains. This is also true in the server it self. If I edit
> /etc/resolv.conf to 127.0.0.1 or its public ip the server cannot resolve to
> other domains say google.com. When I use our ISP's dns in /etc/resolv.conf
> then it can resolve to other domains.
> 
> This are some of my questions. In an authoritative name server, why is it
> that even a caching-nameserver is installed and change /etc/resolv.conf to
> the server's ip this server cannot resolve to other domain but it can
> resolve our domain. Is there something wrong with the configurations? Im
> willing to attach the configuration if needed.

My guess is that your firewall is only allowing DNS out to your ISP's 
server.  When you use your own server, it tries to send DNS to the root 
servers, and this is being blocked by the firewall.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar at alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***



More information about the bind-users mailing list