Is DNS MX Record Required For Email?
nobody at whitehouse.com
Wed Feb 15 00:44:06 UTC 2006
> Is it possible to by-pass the DNS lookup for email like it is for HTTP and
Assming you want to use an IP, yes.
>Is there something about the MX record in DNS that requires a
> "User at DomainName.com" type address for it to work?
> Here's why I ask.
> I have a static, always-on IP address coming into my house. I run Web and
> FTP servers on my PC. They work fine, and have for a long time. My OS is
> Windows NT 2000 Professional.
> When I scan my ports from a remote machine I get what I expect, which is:
> 21 (FTP): Open
> 25 (SMTP): Open
> 80 (WWW): Open
> 110 (POP3): Open
> 143 (IMAP): Open
> I only share data with people I do business with. I prefer to just use my IP
> address instead of aliasing it with a domain name. (For these examples I'll
> use "184.108.40.206", which is of course not my IP. But it's easier to type.) There
> is no DNS entry for "220.127.116.11" anywhere.
> "http://18.104.22.168" gets into my web server without a problem.
> "ftp 22.214.171.124" (DOS prompt) gets to my FTP folder without a problem.
Many mail relays will assume this is spam in an email and refuse it.
> But..., when I send an email to "User at 126.96.36.199" it fails. I have a mail
> account with a Windows based ISP and am experimenting sending mail from it
> to "User at 188.8.131.52". It doesn't work.
Because you didn't use the correct syntax.
> I have my the mail server on my machine configured correctly. And have the
> domain/accounts set up like they should be, including a "User at 184.108.40.206"
Many mail relays will assume you're a spammer and refuse the connection.
> Any thoughts/tips greatly appreciated.
OK... there is no upside to what you're trying to do and lots on
More information about the bind-users