Just how "BAD" is doing this?

Paul Vixie Paul_Vixie at isc.org
Thu Aug 16 21:53:50 UTC 2007


> 	ARIN shows pointing to A.EXAMPLE.COM and B.EXAMPLE.COM . NIC
> has a "HOST RECORD" for both pointing to the actual IPs of 8.EXAMPLE2.COM
> and 13.EXAMPLE2.COM . When you do the lookup for the IN-ADDR.ARPA  , you
> get back the 8.EXAMPLE2.COM and 13.EXAMPLE2.COM NS records.

that's bad.

> 	Ok, so I'm working on "moderately bad". :}

yes.

> 	Given that for "reasons", ARIN won't change the NS records to point to
> 8.EXAMPLE2.COM and 13.EXAMPLE2.COM, and I can't get EXAMPLE2.COM to reply
> with NS records saying A.EXAMPLE.COM and B.EXAMPLE.COM .... Is there some
> other majik I can do to take me either partially or completely out of
> "moderately bad" range?

no.

> ... I guess I was "lucky" previously.

yes.

> 	So, suggestions? (Besides either getting ARIN to change their records,
> or EXAMPLE2.COM to publish the domain with EXAMPLE.COM NS records to
> match...)

no.



More information about the bind-users mailing list