SPF record

[Byung-Hee HWANG]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Res wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> 
>> to say that SPF is somewhat dangerous to use as anti-spam trick.
> 
> I'd disagree, it helps reduce spam that is forged rmember whats SPFs
> true purpose is, the fact it helps in spam reduction is a big plus.

Yep, i agree with spam reduction. However, i was telling you the method
has a risk. You guy need to consider again why the SPF [RFC4408]
remained as Experimental RFC instead of Standards Track at IETF.

>> Recently i'm going with DKIM [RFC4871] as an alternative technique to
>> reduce spam and phishing. DKIM is more reasonable, smooth, exact than
> 
> DKIM is a joke, is it yahoo or gmail or maybe both? use that, and look
> at all the spam that comes from them.

Well, i believe that over the long term, DKIM is win. It means that
peoples adopt reasonable things, at last ;;

byunghee

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkPgFgACgkQsCouaZaxlv443ACgmSI1seQgc7Gckw24WSVqrsAp
IakAn0UzEpFmOKAgRCta1jdim+F/cpzQ
=AP+W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----