Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Wed Aug 12 07:51:42 UTC 2009
> > Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > > We are having 2 sites at different locations now with a DNS resolver on
> > > each site. Internet speed between those two different ISPs is very fast,
> > > and the hosts to resolve will be about the same because of similar
> > > services.
> > >
> > > My idea is to use
> > > forward X;
> > > on site Y and
> > > forward Y;
> > > on site X, but, as I couldn't find it in the documents, I believe this
> > > could lead to a resolver loop between X and Y and therefore even slower
> > > resolution. Or is BIND clever enough to only ask the other server once?
On 11.08.09 11:13, Mark Andrews wrote:
> The forwarding concept was developed when 48k external links
> were *FAST* links and having everyone on a campus use one
> or two machine as a super cache provided some real benefit.
> It still provides some benefit if you are dialing up over
> the PSTN. However if you are using Cable/DSL or similar
> technologies there is little benefit and huge negative
> consequences in the case of the forwarder being down.
We have small farm with more servers behind L3 switch, everything connected
using 2 links... so I think this way of forwarding could help us a bit
especially for domains with servers behind slow links...
> Cross connecting caches is not part of the design strategy
> and will not work well. It would take code changes to make
> it work well.
... but it would require some tuning of forwarding code e.g. to set up
maximum timeout for a forwarding server and to allow sending of
non-recursive queries to a forwarding server.
I think it would be interesting to know if this behaviour could bring us
some benefits but apparently nobody's going to code this...
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...
More information about the bind-users