NS rr configuration: 1*NS + 4xA vs. 4xNS ?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Mon Jun 29 20:09:38 UTC 2009
On 30.06.09 01:08, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <20090629101834.GA31308 at fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> > I am planning to change NS records in our and our customers' zones.
> > I'll have four nameservers on different networks, and I'd like to make
> > configuration as easy as possible by using only one NS record for them all.
> And harder to debug. 1 name to 1 machine is easy to debug.
running either of them behind a L3 switch makes it hard to debug again,
so I wouldn't take that as an issue.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete
More information about the bind-users