multi-master with mysql backend
fddi at gmx.it
Tue Feb 8 15:47:55 UTC 2011
I need really something very simple:
I have 2 domain name servers, I need them to be multi-master so I will
put a mysql instance on each one,
the two mysql servers in sync whith each other.
when one of the servers goes down, the other continue to work.
There are very few entry in hte database let;s say 10 entries of
important internet services which must be
always avaliable... that's it nothing complicate.
now I coudl succesfully build my own bind RPM for CentOS with mysql
I simply used mysql-bind driver patches
now I am trying them out
thank you for all the suggestions you gave me
On 2/8/11 4:28 PM, Gary Wallis wrote:
> fddi wrote:
>> thank you for hte thread you pointed me.
>> Actaully I do not have performance issue, but I just need DNS
>> I could succesfully apply mysql-bind patches.
>> I have only one zone with few hosts.
>> thank you very much
>> On 2/8/11 3:30 PM, Terry. wrote:
>>> 2011/2/8 fddi<fddi at gmx.it>:
>>>> I have considered dlz, but it does mocu more than simply mysql
>>>> backend and
>>>> seems too way complicate for my porpouse.
>>>> At hte end I am considering using this mysql-bind:
>>> You may read this one of the mailing list archive:
>>> bind-users mailing list
>>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> A nice way to deal with what Riccardo's needs is to use ISC BIND
> configured statically (keeps all advantages of a pure BIND system) but
> from a MySQL database that has web apps for end users to manage their
> own zone data. BIND was not meant for end users with little to no DNS
> expertise to manage their RRs. Some middleware is required.
> This is not a new concept but developed from pure dynamic websites to
> ones that "printed" static copies of their pages -now proxies are also
> used as well as memcache for SQL query caching.
> See wikipedia for dns management software.
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
More information about the bind-users