host versus nslookup
marka at isc.org
Thu Oct 13 02:08:52 UTC 2011
In message <040B89C8B1E1D945AE2700C511A039E905A0E5 at ATMEXDB04.dsw.net>, "Lightne
r, Jeff" writes:
> One thing that is different about nslookup on HP-UX (which doesn't have host)
> is that it actually respects nsswitch.conf so will give you results from /et
> c/hosts OR from name services whereas most implementations only do it from na
> me services.
It shouldn't. The NS in nslookup stands for NAMESERVER. Nslookup
is a diagnostic tool for the DNS and corrupting it to lookin
/etc/hosts, NIS, YP, LDAP is just wrong.
> Nslookup is "deprecated" meaning you should use host where possible. Also f
> or DNS troubleshooting dig is a much better tool than nslookup or host.
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
More information about the bind-users