Mangled secondary records...

[Jeff Justice]

Hmmm....okay.  It makes me wonder why my primary isn't doing this as well though.  They have been running the same version.

Jeff


On Aug 18, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) <michoski at cisco.com> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: Jeff Justice <listaccount at starionline.com>
> Date: Saturday, August 18, 2012 12:24 AM
> To: "bind-users at lists.isc.org" <bind-users at lists.isc.org>
> Subject: Mangled secondary records...
> 
>> I made a change in all of the master records and wanted to force the
>> slave to update.
>> 
>> I deleted all the host files on the secondary and restarted named.
>> 
>> It pulls all the domains in and creates new host files, but when you view
>> the host files for each domain, they appear to be garbled.
>> 
>> Running the same BIND version on both primary and secondary.
>> 
>> Help!  Secondary is effectively down as a result...
> 
> Are you sure you're not just seeing "compiled" zones that are now default
> in 9.9?
> 
> http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/9.9/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#zonefile_form
> at
> 
> http://www.isc.org/software/bind/new-features/9.9
> 
> http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.protocols.dns.bind/2012-0
> 6/msg00094.html
> 
> If you really want the old behavior, try your exercise again after adding
> "masterfile-format text;" to your options clause.
> 
> This is a FAQ.  :-)
> 
>