Can we load balance traf[f]ic for CNAME records?

[Manish Rane]

That is true by default rrset-order is cyclic I believe. And even if it
replies randomly I guess we will have to NAT the traffic on firewall for
particular IPs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks and Regards,
Manish R



On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Barry Margolin <barmar at alum.mit.edu>wrote:

> In article <mailman.897.1355501135.11945.bind-users at lists.isc.org>,
>  "Novosielski, Ryan" <novosirj at umdnj.edu> wrote:
>
> > Won't the DNS server randomly report the the defined IP addresses?
>
> RFC 6186 is about using SRV records, not round-robin DNS.
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Barry Margolin [mailto:barmar at alum.mit.edu]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 10:49 AM
> To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org
> > <comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org>
> > Subject: Re: Can we load balance traf[f]ic for CNAME records?
> >
> > In article <mailman.885.1355477939.11945.bind-users at lists.isc.org>,
> >  SM <sm at resistor.net> wrote:
> >
> > > See RFC 6186.  Verify whether the mail clients support that
> specification.
> >
> > Are there any mail clients that support this yet?
>
> --
> Barry Margolin
> Arlington, MA
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
>
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20121215/c5281a9b/attachment.html>