romgo at free.fr
Fri Mar 9 15:58:08 UTC 2012
I know that I can use VIP with any software (corosync, Linux HA...) But
this will not explain the origin of the issue I am facing :)
Even if I use a VIP I can reproduce the issue :
If the first VIP (so the nameserver 1) is down, I'll have the same
drawbacks. As the resolver will timeout before falling back to the second
On 9 March 2012 10:13, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 06:26 PM, michoski wrote:
> Meant to add one thing... In our configuration, we actually have two
>> recursive VIPs per site, and even considered three (internal IPs are
> We do this.
> We also make the two different VIPs use different underlying tech - one is
> an anycast route advertised with eBGP, the other is via load-balancing. The
> diversity of tech gives us a bit more resilience and flexibility - taking
> out the load-balancer no longer destroys DNS, for example.
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/**listinfo/bind-users<https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users>to unsubscribe from this list
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users