Lots of "RSA_verify failed" after upgrade to 9.7.7

Noel Butler noel.butler at ausics.net
Mon Apr 1 06:14:46 UTC 2013


On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 15:03 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:

> In message <1364786722.6226.2.camel at tardis>, Noel Butler writes:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 21:21 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Ignore them.  They will be addressed in the next maintenance release.
> > >  
> > 
> > 
> > it was, but now seems to have reared its ugly head again in 9.9.2-p2
> > 
> > Apr  1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: RSA_verify failed
> > Apr  1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: error:04077068:rsa
> > routines:RSA_verify:bad signature:rsa_sign.c:263:
> > Apr  1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: RSA_verify failed
> > Apr  1 12:20:35 fox named[589]: error:04077068:rsa
> > routines:RSA_verify:bad signature:rsa_sign.c:263:
> 
> BIND 9.7.7 and BIND 9.9.2 were both released at the same time (Oct
> 9, 2012).
> 
> BIND 9.9.2-P1 and BIND 9.9.2-P2 are security releases.
> 
> The betas of the next maintenance release 9.9.3b1 and 9.9.3b2
> contain the fix.
> 


Using 9.9.3b3 on one nameserver now, yes all seems good
 Have always used the latest version, applied a patch you gave me
earlier, could of sworn it was fixed, unless I applied two patches and
didnt think about second one. If b3 remains stable after a few days I'll
throw it on main production.

Cheers


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130401/bc814652/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130401/bc814652/attachment.bin>


More information about the bind-users mailing list