New warning message...

[Noel Butler]

On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 02:51 -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> It's exactly as it says...
> 
> 
> Instead of 
> ... TXT "SPF ..."
> 
> 
> You now do
> 
> 
> ... SPF "SPF ..."
> 
> 


Mark Andrews wrote:
No.  It has a legacy SPF TXT record.  It SHOULD have record of
type SPF as per RFC 4408. 

Named will complain if both types are not present.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130722/2866fcf7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20130722/2866fcf7/attachment.bin>