rndc (and now nsupdate too)
mail at ojkastl.de
Fri Aug 1 14:38:53 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 01.08.14 15:58 Reindl Harald wrote:
> the whole discussion about rndc or not rndc follow up therads and
> side-threads startet after that reply below from me yesterday and
> whoever brought "bounce" in the game did also not understand the
> context of the discussion
Calm down, everyone. Please. I did not intend to start a thread that
long and, uhm, intense...
My (simplified) conclusion:
In most setups, using rndc is the right way, because most people do
not know its advantages or the disadvantages of killing the daemon.
But there is a german saying "Ausnahmen bestätigen die Regel", which
could be translated as 'exceptions prove the rule'. So, those
(exceptions) who really do know what they are doing can workaround rndc.
Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of diseased mind.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bind-users