still have named memory leak
rkoberman at gmail.com
Sat Dec 13 18:07:29 UTC 2014
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Mukund Sivaraman <muks at isc.org> wrote:
> Hi Len
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lconrad at go2france.com wrote:
> > binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1
> > named 9.10.1, compiled from source
> > at named start, 305 MB memory
> > after several hours of running named is approaching 800 MB. I'm sure
> after a
> > couple of days, as before, it will head towards 2000 MB
> > suggestions?
> > this is a recursive only NS, about 20M q/day restricted by ACL to
> > "ournetworks"
> This tells us that the named process size grows large, but more
> information is needed to discover why. Can you send us the following?
> 1. Your named configuration.
> 2. Regular dumps over time of the statistics that are available via
> HTTP, as the named process grows. See the "statistics-channels"
> documentation in the manual. You can use curl or wget to dump them to a
The standard tool for this on FreeBSD is fetch(1). E.g. fetch -o FILE "URL"
In a script I usually also use '-q' to eliminate noise, but YMMV.
I suspect most systems have wget and/or curl installed, but fetch is always
present on FreeBSD.
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users