I may be confused regarding sub delegated zone

Blason R blason16 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 23 17:58:58 UTC 2014


Perfect this is what I m thinking. So in some case I observed that
subdomain.example.com has ns record specified but no A record associated
with it. But if i do query set type=ns to parent ns record it shows
something else.

Like

Set typ=ns
Sybdom.example.com

Ns5.example.com

Set type=a
Ns5.example.com
No A record

Server ns1.example.com

Set type=ns
Subdom.example.com
Ns2.example.com

Is this setup correct?
On 23 Jan 2014 23:04, "Ben Croswell" <ben.croswell at gmail.com> wrote:

> A freshly started server with no cache will be directed to nd1 first which
> will give a referral to ns2 for the subdomain. After that it will go to ns2
> directly until the ns records time out in cache.
> On Jan 23, 2014 12:30 PM, "Blason R" <blason16 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello friends,
>>
>> I may sound like novice but have basic question regarding Sub-zone which
>> is an delegated zone. lets say I have zone example.com whose NS are
>> ns1.example.com and then I have delegated sub-zone subdom.example.comwhose ns record would be say
>> ns2.example.com.
>>
>> So people who will be querying to A record for subdom.example.com [which
>> @] will first be forwarded to ns1.example.com and then from there ns
>> record of subdom.example.com will be given?
>>
>> Or will it directly be forwarded to n2.example.com?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
>> unsubscribe from this list
>>
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140123/85afab5b/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list