SPF RR type

Noel Butler noel.butler at ausics.net
Sat Jun 7 04:00:13 UTC 2014

On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 12:18 -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:

> Given the heated and bitter debates over the SPF record type (see 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/maillist.html, 
> search "SPF", around August of last year), I'm thinking that "a couple 
> years" probably translates into "indefinitely" or even "never".

Agreed, there is one in particular debian dev who is viciously against
the record type, I for one wont be withdrawing it any time

> Some people seem to think the role of the IETF is merely to passively 
> document terrible designs and/or implementations...
>                                                              - Kevin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140607/1684302e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20140607/1684302e/attachment.bin>

More information about the bind-users mailing list