bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak?

Vinícius Ferrão ferrao at if.ufrj.br
Tue Sep 9 14:17:30 UTC 2014


I'm having the exactly same issue. Take a look at my post @ServerFault: http://serverfault.com/questions/616752/bind-9-10-constantly-killed-on-freebsd-10-0-with-out-of-swap-space

Sent from my iPhone

On 09/09/2014, at 11:15, "Thomas Schulz" <schulz at adi.com> wrote:

>> Hello
>> 
>> I recently upgraded my authoritative nameservers to bind-9.10.0-P2 and 
>> after a while one of them ended up using all its swap and the named 
>> process got killed. The other servers are seeing similar behaviour, but 
>> I restarted named on all of them to postpone further crashes.
>> 
>> I am using rate-limiting as well DLZ with PostgreSQL. The server has two 
>> views. The operating system is FreeBSD 8.4.
>> 
>> My configuration:
>> http://borderworlds.dk/~xi/named-leak/named.conf
>> 
>> Log of the memory usage:
>> http://borderworlds.dk/~xi/named-leak/named-mem-usage.log
>> 
>> As you can see, in less than a week, named has grown more than 900MB in 
>> size.
>> 
>> Is anyone else experiencing something similar?
>> 
>> If I need to provide more information, I will be happy to do so.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Christian Laursen
> 
> What version did you upgrade from? I am seeing bind 9.9.5 and 9.9.6
> grow without any evidence that it will ever stop. See my mail to this
> list with the subject "Re: Process size versus cache size." Mine is
> growing slower than yours, but it is now up to 548 MB.
> 
> Tom Schulz
> Applied Dynamics Intl.
> schulz at adi.com
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


More information about the bind-users mailing list