configuration error in lists.isc.org

Noel Butler noel.butler at ausics.net
Mon Aug 10 23:05:49 UTC 2015


 

On 11/08/2015 07:59, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote: 

> On 2015-08-10 16:49, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote: 
> 
>> Though I realize my error not recalling that there is a middle (neutral)
>> level, and which is more appropriate, since softfail is somewhere between
>> fail and neutral which is not where I had intended the servers to be.
> Went to fix it, only to discover that I had fixed it 1.5 years ago....maybe I am losing my mind. Did while cleaning up SPF after an O365 verification, too.
> 
> Thought read somewhere that the SPF RR has been discontinued. Should I, and is it safe to, remove those now?

The removal drive has been very vocal mostly from one person, a debian
maintainer, it matters not if he got his own way or not, the SPF RR wont
go away overnight (for example it took debian YEARS to modernise to
understand that type, so it'll take em years to drop it LOL), expect it
to be supported and used for many years to come, either way, it wont
hurt to have it there, it will not break anything, if the code is ever
removed (highly unlikely) named and co just wont care, it'll be "just
another DNS RR" and ignore it. I have no intention of removing mine
until such a time, if that time comes, that the code is removed from
named. 

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20150811/93d3a57b/attachment.html>


More information about the bind-users mailing list