timeouts and negative caching
dot at dotat.at
Thu Jun 11 15:51:11 UTC 2015
Mike Hoskins (michoski) <michoski at cisco.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if BIND has a separate tunable for the "timeout vs true
> negative answer" scenario you seem to describe, but have you tried setting
> max-ncache-ttl very low to see if it affects this?
Look at the lame-ttl option. (though I think the behaviour is more
complicated than the documentation implies)
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Shannon: North 5 to 7. Slight or moderate. Thundery showers later. Good,
occasionally poor later.
More information about the bind-users