timeouts and negative caching
Gerd v. Egidy
lists at egidy.de
Thu Jun 11 20:51:48 UTC 2015
> Look at the lame-ttl option. (though I think the behaviour is more
> complicated than the documentation implies)
I can report that lame-ttl doesn't help either, the timeout ttl stays at 300
>From reading the manual it seems to me that a "lame server" is something
different than a server not responding in time. But as you suggest it may be
that the manual does not cover this completely...
At least I have perfected the procedure to reproduce the behavior, it just
takes me a few minutes now till I get it.
More information about the bind-users