Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar at
Wed Mar 18 10:02:54 UTC 2015

>> On 18.03.15 11:48, Constantin Stefanov wrote:
>>> then both views will refernce ther same writable file, won't they? Or am
>>> I missing something about "in-view" directive?

>On 18.03.2015 11:56, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> maybe you could put all those zone definitions into one file and include it
>> in each view.

On 18.03.15 12:05, Constantin Stefanov wrote:
>I can't. It stopped working after upgrade to 9.10, but worked before
>with 9.6. And the question is how to keep the config as simple as it was
>before upgrade.

I mean, the "in-view" definitions...

>> the only other way is stop using views...

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at ;
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory. 

More information about the bind-users mailing list