Single slave zone definition for two view (cache file name problem)

Konstantin Stefanov cstef at
Wed Mar 18 10:10:55 UTC 2015

On 18.03.2015 13:02, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> On 18.03.15 11:48, Constantin Stefanov wrote:
>>>> then both views will refernce ther same writable file, won't they? Or am
>>>> I missing something about "in-view" directive?
>> On 18.03.2015 11:56, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> maybe you could put all those zone definitions into one file and include it
>>> in each view.
> On 18.03.15 12:05, Constantin Stefanov wrote:
>> I can't. It stopped working after upgrade to 9.10, but worked before
>> with 9.6. And the question is how to keep the config as simple as it was
>> before upgrade.
> I mean, the "in-view" definitions...
So now I have to have two definitions for every slave zone in different
files. Well, it is the thing I did, but I do not like it.

Requirement to have 2 synced definitions in 2 different places leads to

>>> the only other way is stop using views...

Konstantin Stefanov,

Research Computing Center
M.V Lomonosov Moscow State University

More information about the bind-users mailing list