PCS, Corosync, Pacemaker, and Bind
bernhardt at bart.gov
Wed Mar 16 17:47:42 UTC 2016
Another question I have is, how exactly does BIND determine whether the IP
address is valid when setting listen-on or various source options? Although
ifconfig does not show the address, "ip addr" does show it and it is
From: Tony Finch [mailto:dot at dotat.at]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 5:40 PM
To: Mike Bernhardt
Cc: bind-users at lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: PCS, Corosync, Pacemaker, and Bind
Mike Bernhardt <bernhardt at bart.gov> wrote:
> I'm setting up a new CentOS 7 DNS server cluster to replace our very
> old CentOS 4 cluster. The old one uses heartbeat which is no longer
> supported, so I'm now using pcs, corosync, and pacemaker.
I suggest having a look at keepalived: it's significantly simpler.
> I want BIND to listen on, query from, etc on a particular IP address,
> which is virtualized. The options currently used are:
> query-source address
> listen-on isn't a big deal, but the source address options are.
Why do you care about the query source address?
I don't set any of those options and just let BIND pick whatever source
address it wants; it might choose the server admin address or the advertised
service address, and that doesn't matter because everything else is
configured to accommodate this.
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Shannon, Rockall:
Southeast 4 or 5, increasing 6 at times in Shannon. Moderate or rough. Fair.
More information about the bind-users