DNS traffic accounting

Abi Askushi rightkicktech at gmail.com
Sun Jul 23 13:53:35 UTC 2017

Because i would like to avoid counting traffic for cached responses. But
this is an option also if all other are not easy.

On Jul 23, 2017 16:19, "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uhlar at fantomas.sk> wrote:

> On 22.07.17 21:51, Abi Askushi wrote:
>> I was wondering if bind9 can support TPROXY. This would facilate my
>> accounting as then all WAN traffic would have the client IP as the source
>> IP. ( I have a similar configuration with squid where I was able to
>> account
>> the WAN traffic using this trick without having to deal with squid stats
>> and cache)
> again: why don't you simply traffic between the bind server and clients?
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase, (D)elete
> _______________________________________________
> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
> unsubscribe from this list
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/attachments/20170723/53307395/attachment.html>

More information about the bind-users mailing list