are you using lwres?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Fri May 19 12:58:45 UTC 2017
On 18.05.17 21:13, Evan Hunt wrote:
>At ISC we've recently been discussing the idea of deprecating the
>lightweight resolver interface as of BIND 9.12. This means removing lwresd
>and liblwres, and deprecating the lwres statement in named.conf. (Note
>that they would remain available in earlier releases; BIND 9.11 will be
>supported for several years yet.)
>Before we decide to do this, it would be helpful to know whether there are
>any legacy applications depending on it. Based on the number of support
>questions we get about lwresd (i.e., pretty close to none) there aren't
>many, but perhaps they're just quiet. Do you run lwresd or named-with-
>lwres? Do you have code that links with liblwres? If so, please let me
I tried using it some 10 years ago. I had strange results related to rrset
ordering (with nss_dns the bind-provided ordering worked, with ndd_lwres I
got re-sorted IPs) so I disabled it.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Saving Private Ryan...
Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N)
More information about the bind-users